The
mystery of why humans are the only animals to have chins may have been
solved by scientists who suggest that it is linked to the invention of
cooking.
A number of different explanations have
been put forward for the apparently useless appendage, including the
idea that it helps humans attract a mate.
A paper from the University of Florida is the latest attempt to explain exactly why humans - unlike all other primates - have chins.
But new research pours cold water on
that theory - pointing instead to the way the jaw evolved and shrank to
deal with the fact that cooking was making food softer.
A paper from the University of Florida is the latest attempt to explain exactly why humans - unlike all other primates - have chins.
Author James Pampush points out that the
fact that apes and monkeys do not have chins proves that they must have
evolved after the ancestors of man split off from other branches of the
primate family.
Some have argued in the past that
the development of the chin could be a purely random example of 'genetic
drift', with no evolutionary purpose whatsoever.
However, the new
research - published in the Journal of Human Evolution - says that
because the evolution of the chin happened 77 times faster than the
average genetic change, it is highly unlikely to have been random.
Dr Pampush calculated that the chin
began to emerge some time between 6million and 200,000 years ago, with
the most likely estimate being around 2million years ago.
This would coincide with the enormous
leap forward in human intelligence, which led to breakthroughs including
the invention of cooking.
The evolution of the chin came about as a
result of humans' teeth and jaws shrinking, because they no longer
needed to chew through raw meat and plants, Dr Pampush told the
Independent on Sunday.
'My guess is that it happened around two
million years ago when there was a jump in brain size,' he said. 'We
had a soft diet, and we no longer needed big teeth.
'I'm guessing the changes which
ultimately lead to the chin are directly related to cooking, and
indirectly related to larger brains and bodies.'
Because the chin is a by-product of an
evolutionary change, rather than being selected for directly, it is what
scientists call a 'spandrel'.
Dr Pampush's new theory goes against
previous suggestions that the chin was an example of sexual selection,
with prominent chins marking out men who are likely to make good mates.
The fact that both men and women have
chins means the sexual selection theory is unlikely, because such
developments usually apply only to one of the sexes, not both.
Another theory put forward in the past
claimed that the chin was a way to balance out the stress put on the jaw
by the action of chewing, but Dr Pampush also cast doubt on that idea.
Did this just blow your mind or what? I'm still in shock. I Thought chins were just another part of the body that all living beings have.
No comments:
Post a Comment